Directions

Ingredients

New Research: Women Read Minds Better Than Men


What kind of study was this?

This was a psychological assessment validation study, which means that researchers went through a multi-step process to develop a questionnaire that would detect some psychological phenomenon, and are now testing the questionnaire on real people to see if it works the way they expect it to work.

What did researchers want to know?

In this validation study, researchers wanted to know if this questionnaire actually measured mind-reading apart from “empathy” (feeling what another person is feeling) and autistic vs. non-autistic traits.

Mind reading is also known in psychological research as ‘mentalising,’ which is the ability to understand what another person is thinking by detecting subtle, non-verbal cues like facial expression and body posture.

What did the researchers actually do?

They gave the questionnaire to a bunch of people, both autistic and non-autistic. They also gave the same people other questionnaires so that their answers could be statistically compared to make sure the mentalising questionnaire was measuring something unique.

They also used statistical methods to make sure that different questions on the questionnaire acted the way the researchers expected them to act.

What did the researchers find?

They found that the questionnaire measured something unique apart from empathy and autistic vs. non-autistic behavior and that it is a valid assessment of mentalising. They also found that on average women scored higher in mentalising than men.

What does this mean for parents and kids?

Hmmm. We’ll let everyone draw their own conclusions!

Original article:

Clutterbuck, R. A., Callan, M. J., Taylor, E. C., Livingston, L. A., & Shah, P. (2021). Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001004

New Research: Women Read Minds Better Than Men

Close
Theme icon

Podcast /

Content /

Flourish

New Research: Women Read Minds Better Than Men

Women are better than men at picking up on non-verbal cues that indicate what other people are thinking

Join the Yes Collective and download the mobile app today

JOIN TODAY

Key takeaways

1

2

3

Low hassle, high nutrition

Fierce Food: Easy

Fierce Food: Easy

50/50 mixes of powerful veggies and starchy favorites

Fierce Food: Balance

Fierce Food: Balance

Maximize nutrients, minimize sugar and starch

Fierce Food: Power

Fierce Food: Power

Ingredients

Kitchen Equipment

Ingredient Replacement

View replacement list (PDF)

Reading time:

3 Minutes


What kind of study was this?

This was a psychological assessment validation study, which means that researchers went through a multi-step process to develop a questionnaire that would detect some psychological phenomenon, and are now testing the questionnaire on real people to see if it works the way they expect it to work.

What did researchers want to know?

In this validation study, researchers wanted to know if this questionnaire actually measured mind-reading apart from “empathy” (feeling what another person is feeling) and autistic vs. non-autistic traits.

Mind reading is also known in psychological research as ‘mentalising,’ which is the ability to understand what another person is thinking by detecting subtle, non-verbal cues like facial expression and body posture.

What did the researchers actually do?

They gave the questionnaire to a bunch of people, both autistic and non-autistic. They also gave the same people other questionnaires so that their answers could be statistically compared to make sure the mentalising questionnaire was measuring something unique.

They also used statistical methods to make sure that different questions on the questionnaire acted the way the researchers expected them to act.

What did the researchers find?

They found that the questionnaire measured something unique apart from empathy and autistic vs. non-autistic behavior and that it is a valid assessment of mentalising. They also found that on average women scored higher in mentalising than men.

What does this mean for parents and kids?

Hmmm. We’ll let everyone draw their own conclusions!

Original article:

Clutterbuck, R. A., Callan, M. J., Taylor, E. C., Livingston, L. A., & Shah, P. (2021). Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001004


What kind of study was this?

This was a psychological assessment validation study, which means that researchers went through a multi-step process to develop a questionnaire that would detect some psychological phenomenon, and are now testing the questionnaire on real people to see if it works the way they expect it to work.

What did researchers want to know?

In this validation study, researchers wanted to know if this questionnaire actually measured mind-reading apart from “empathy” (feeling what another person is feeling) and autistic vs. non-autistic traits.

Mind reading is also known in psychological research as ‘mentalising,’ which is the ability to understand what another person is thinking by detecting subtle, non-verbal cues like facial expression and body posture.

What did the researchers actually do?

They gave the questionnaire to a bunch of people, both autistic and non-autistic. They also gave the same people other questionnaires so that their answers could be statistically compared to make sure the mentalising questionnaire was measuring something unique.

They also used statistical methods to make sure that different questions on the questionnaire acted the way the researchers expected them to act.

What did the researchers find?

They found that the questionnaire measured something unique apart from empathy and autistic vs. non-autistic behavior and that it is a valid assessment of mentalising. They also found that on average women scored higher in mentalising than men.

What does this mean for parents and kids?

Hmmm. We’ll let everyone draw their own conclusions!

Original article:

Clutterbuck, R. A., Callan, M. J., Taylor, E. C., Livingston, L. A., & Shah, P. (2021). Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001004


What kind of study was this?

This was a psychological assessment validation study, which means that researchers went through a multi-step process to develop a questionnaire that would detect some psychological phenomenon, and are now testing the questionnaire on real people to see if it works the way they expect it to work.

What did researchers want to know?

In this validation study, researchers wanted to know if this questionnaire actually measured mind-reading apart from “empathy” (feeling what another person is feeling) and autistic vs. non-autistic traits.

Mind reading is also known in psychological research as ‘mentalising,’ which is the ability to understand what another person is thinking by detecting subtle, non-verbal cues like facial expression and body posture.

What did the researchers actually do?

They gave the questionnaire to a bunch of people, both autistic and non-autistic. They also gave the same people other questionnaires so that their answers could be statistically compared to make sure the mentalising questionnaire was measuring something unique.

They also used statistical methods to make sure that different questions on the questionnaire acted the way the researchers expected them to act.

What did the researchers find?

They found that the questionnaire measured something unique apart from empathy and autistic vs. non-autistic behavior and that it is a valid assessment of mentalising. They also found that on average women scored higher in mentalising than men.

What does this mean for parents and kids?

Hmmm. We’ll let everyone draw their own conclusions!

Original article:

Clutterbuck, R. A., Callan, M. J., Taylor, E. C., Livingston, L. A., & Shah, P. (2021). Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001004

Enjoying this article? Subscribe to the Yes Collective for more expert emotional wellness just for parents.

Discover Nourish

See more
New Research: Women Read Minds Better Than Men

Podcast

Condimentum eu tortor bibendum.

By

Jackie Kovic

New Research: Women Read Minds Better Than Men

Podcast

Condimentum eu tortor bibendum.

By

Jackie Kovic

Podcast

Condimentum eu tortor bibendum.

By

Jackie Kovic

Podcast Ep. 67: Breaking Cycles with Jenny & Justin

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 67: Breaking Cycles with Jenny & Justin

By

The Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 65: Authentic Dating with Executive Matchmaker and Dating Coach, Sophy Singer

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 65: Authentic Dating with Executive Matchmaker and Dating Coach, Sophy Singer

By

Yes Collective

Podcast Ep. 64: Ryel Kestano Shares What it Takes to Build Deep, Nourishing Relationships

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 64: Ryel Kestano Shares What it Takes to Build Deep, Nourishing Relationships

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 63: An Authentic Fresh Start with Christopher Gray

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 63: An Authentic Fresh Start with Christopher Gray

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 62: Re-centering, Renewing, and Refreshing in the New Year with Audra DiPadova

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 62: Re-centering, Renewing, and Refreshing in the New Year with Audra DiPadova

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 61: Honoring Your Grief During the Holidays with Vanessa Fierstadt, MS, MFT

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 61: Honoring Your Grief During the Holidays with Vanessa Fierstadt, MS, MFT

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 60: Bringing "Woo" Into Therapy with Janell Cox, LMFT

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 60: Bringing "Woo" Into Therapy with Janell Cox, LMFT

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 59: The Power of Woo for Mental and Emotional Health with Jenny Walters, LMFT

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 59: The Power of Woo for Mental and Emotional Health with Jenny Walters, LMFT

By

Yes Collective

Podcast Ep. 58: Creating a Work/Life Wellness Culture with Organizational Psychologist, Avina Gupta, PhD

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 58: Creating a Work/Life Wellness Culture with Organizational Psychologist, Avina Gupta, PhD

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 57: Building More Work/Life Wholeness with Jenn Cornelius, Chief People Officer at Ritual

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 57: Building More Work/Life Wholeness with Jenn Cornelius, Chief People Officer at Ritual

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 67: Breaking Cycles with Jenny & Justin

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 67: Breaking Cycles with Jenny & Justin

By

The Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 65: Authentic Dating with Executive Matchmaker and Dating Coach, Sophy Singer

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 65: Authentic Dating with Executive Matchmaker and Dating Coach, Sophy Singer

By

Yes Collective

Podcast Ep. 64: Ryel Kestano Shares What it Takes to Build Deep, Nourishing Relationships

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 64: Ryel Kestano Shares What it Takes to Build Deep, Nourishing Relationships

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 63: An Authentic Fresh Start with Christopher Gray

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 63: An Authentic Fresh Start with Christopher Gray

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 62: Re-centering, Renewing, and Refreshing in the New Year with Audra DiPadova

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 62: Re-centering, Renewing, and Refreshing in the New Year with Audra DiPadova

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 61: Honoring Your Grief During the Holidays with Vanessa Fierstadt, MS, MFT

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 61: Honoring Your Grief During the Holidays with Vanessa Fierstadt, MS, MFT

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 60: Bringing "Woo" Into Therapy with Janell Cox, LMFT

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 60: Bringing "Woo" Into Therapy with Janell Cox, LMFT

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 59: The Power of Woo for Mental and Emotional Health with Jenny Walters, LMFT

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 59: The Power of Woo for Mental and Emotional Health with Jenny Walters, LMFT

By

Yes Collective

Podcast Ep. 58: Creating a Work/Life Wellness Culture with Organizational Psychologist, Avina Gupta, PhD

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 58: Creating a Work/Life Wellness Culture with Organizational Psychologist, Avina Gupta, PhD

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Podcast Ep. 57: Building More Work/Life Wholeness with Jenn Cornelius, Chief People Officer at Ritual

Podcast

Podcast Ep. 57: Building More Work/Life Wholeness with Jenn Cornelius, Chief People Officer at Ritual

By

Yes Collective Podcast

Subscribe to get all the goods

Join the app
Login